|LETTER TO EDITOR
|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 340-342
Re: The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
Leena Jain, Samir Madhukar Kumta, Shrirang Keshav Purohit
Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Web Publication||7-Mar-2019|
Dr. Leena Jain
No. 301, 3rd Floor, C Wing, Dheeraj Presidency, M. G. Road, Kandivali West, Mumbai - 400 067, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Jain L, Kumta SM, Purohit SK. Re: The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice. Indian J Plast Surg 2018;51:340-2
|How to cite this URL:|
Jain L, Kumta SM, Purohit SK. Re: The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice. Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 18];51:340-2. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2018/51/3/340/253556
We congratulate Balan et al., for their work describing the reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap for cover of finger defects. They have exemplified its utility in a wide spectrum of dorsal finger defects, providing a simple single stage cover with like tissue without any donor site morbidity.
However, the authors describe this flap being based on retrograde flow through the dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) through communicating perforators, while in the surgical procedure described, they have not mentioned that they have raised the flap with the DMA. That implies that the flap is based on a perforator. With this in mind, we beg to differ in understanding the dynamics of blood flow to the flap- antegrade vis-a-vis retrograde. To clarify the same, we would like to highlight a few anatomical features of dorsal hand circulation [Figure 1] and exemplify with description of two flaps based on DMA- reverse dorsal metacarpal artery (RDMA) flap and dorsal metacarpal artery perforator (DMAP) flap [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: Illustration of vascular anatomy of a ray forming the vascular basis of volar and dorsal flaps|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Cadaveric dissection showing the dorsal metacarpal artery based flaps (A) reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap shows the dorsal metacarpal artery in the flap marked as ‘a’ and the branch communicating with the palmar metacarpal artery at the level of head of metacarpal marked as ‘b’. (B) Dorsal metacarpal artery perforator (DMAP) flap shows DMA in situ as ‘c’ with its dominant cutaneous perforator at the level of web space marked as ‘d’. There are small communicating branches passing volarly from this cutaneous perforator|
Click here to view
Distally, the DMA ramifies at the level of the metacarpal heads and its branches can be identified distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint travelling to the dorsal proximal phalangeal skin of the fingers where they anastomose with the dorsal branches of the palmar digital arteries. Quaba and Davison, in 18 cadaveric dissections, described that these branches travelled proximally (recurred) forming longitudinally oriented plexuses. In each of these vascular leashes, a small (0.3–0.5 mm) perforator arising directly from the DMA, or when the latter is absent, a perforator from the volar system was demonstrated. Such perforators connecting the palmar and dorsal metacarpal arteries are seen either proximal to metacarpal head or at the level of the base of proximal phalanx-near the web.
In RDMA flap, superficial veins are interrupted and the proximal end of the vessels (veins and DMA) are ligated at the proximal margin of the flap. Blood flows into and out of the flap through a number of branches and tributaries, contained in a mesentery or a fascial septum. To reach the general circulation, the blood must reverse its flow through the veins. The arterial flow is retrograde in the DMA through the communicating perforators [Figure 3]
|Figure 3: Patient with a volar surface thumb defect resurfaced with a first reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap (A) volar thumb defect (B) dorsal metacarpal artery seen harvested in the flap marked as ‘a’; perforator seen at neck of second metacarpal marked as ‘b’. (C) Reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap inset into the defect with primary closure of donor site|
Click here to view
The DMAP flap is based on a dominant communicating perforator or a direct cutaneous vessel which enters the flap, anatomically speaking, at its distal end. Although out-flow through superficial veins may be interrupted, venous return through the deep system remains undisturbed [Figure 4]. This is thus based on antegrade flow through the DMA and/or the palmar metacarpal artery through the perforator, and it is a perforator-based flap. Flap based on the proximal perforator at the level of metacarpal head, is called ‘DMAP flap’ while flap based on the distal perforator at the level of web space, is called ‘extended DMAP flap’.
|Figure 4: Patient with dorsal finger defect resurfaced with dorsal metacar pal artery perforator flap (A) Dorsum of proximal phalanx defect with exposed bone and loss of extensor tendon (B) dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap elevated with dorsa l metacarpal artery seen in the second interosseous space marked as ‘a’ and perforator supplying the flap seen at the level of head of metacarpal marked as ‘b’. (C) Flap inset completed with primary closure of donor site|
Click here to view
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| » References|| |
Balan JR, Mathew S, Kumar P, Vardhan H, Francis A, Aniljith VG, et al.
The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice. Indian J Plast Surg 2018;51:54-9.
] [Full text]
Maruyama Y. The reverse dorsal metacarpal flap. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:24-7.
Quaba AA, Davison PM. The distally-based dorsal hand flap. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:28-39.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]