Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 1215  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (2,094 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed133    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 252-254
 

Heterotopic ossification of the vascular pedicle of fibula causing trismus


1 Department of Plastic, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nikunj Mody
1G, 91/92, Kalpataru Aura, L. B. S. Road, Ghatkopar West, Mumbai - 400 086, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_85_18

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Mody N, Kumta S, Purohit S, Ummul R, Nehete S, Jain L. Heterotopic ossification of the vascular pedicle of fibula causing trismus. Indian J Plast Surg 2018;51:252-4

How to cite this URL:
Mody N, Kumta S, Purohit S, Ummul R, Nehete S, Jain L. Heterotopic ossification of the vascular pedicle of fibula causing trismus. Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12];51:252-4. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2018/51/2/252/244370


Sir,

The fibula is the most common vascularised bone used for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction. In patients with ectodermal dysplasia, a very rare condition, the fibula can be used for alveolar reconstruction to increase the height of the bone to enable placement of implants for dental rehabilitation.[1] The distal part of the harvested fibula bone is used for reconstruction, while the proximal part is discarded by extra-periosteal dissection. However, during the fine-tuning of the osteotomy, some part of the periosteum is retained along the vascular pedicle. This vascularised periosteum attached to the vascular pedicle has osteogenic potential.[2] This heterotopic periosteal ossification is a rare but known phenomenon;[3] however, symptomatic ossification requiring surgical management is uncommon.

We report a case of anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, reconstructed with free fibular flap and osseointegrated implants, who developed trismus 2 years after the microvascular reconstruction due to heterotopic ossification of the vascular pedicle.

An 18-year-old male patient with anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia presented to us with the absence of all teeth and underdeveloped upper and lower alveolar ridges. He needed upper alveolar reconstruction, as the alveolar bone thickness below the maxillary sinuses was barely 1 mm. In the lower jaw too, the bone height above the inferior alveolar nerve was not sufficient for the placement of implants. However, in the central segment, between the two mental foramina, the bone height was sufficient for implant placement. In October 2015, a free fibula transfer was performed for the upper alveolar reconstruction with fixation done using titanium miniplates [Figure 1]. In March 2017, the miniplates were removed, and osseointegrated implants were placed in the upper and lower alveolus. His mouth opening at the time was good enough to allow the intraoral manipulation necessary for implant insertion. However, the patient then felt progressively increasing trismus and reduction in jaw movements, until finally, he was unable to move his jaw at all. The orthopantomogram and the computed tomography scan revealed the presence of a bony block on the left side between the reconstructed maxilla and the ramus of the mandible below the coronoid process, along the course of the vascular pedicle [Figure 2]. He was operated on for removal of the bony block under general anaesthesia in January 2018. Through an intraoral incision along the upper gingivobuccal sulcus, extraperiosteal removal of a 1 cm block of bone from the ossified vascular pedicle was performed. Patient's inter-incisor distance improved from 1 cm to 4 cm in the immediate post-operative period, with free movement of the lower jaw [Figure 3]. Histopathology confirmed that the excised block was showing normal bony architecture. Three months after the procedure, the mouth opening and jaw movements have been maintained and additional implants could be placed in his mandible [Figure 4].
Figure 1: Fixation of free fibula flap for the upper alveolar augmentation and the post - operative orthopantomogram showing the fixation

Click here to view
Figure 2: Pre -operative orthopantomogram and three dimensional computer tomography scan showing bony block along the course of vascular pedicle of the free fibula flap

Click here to view
Figure 3: Pre- and immediate post - operative photos of the patient showing improvement in mouth opening

Click here to view
Figure 4: Post- operative orthopantomogram after removal of the bony block showing additional implants being placed

Click here to view


Periosteum preserves its osteogenic potential, even after transposition, especially in a re-vascularised flap. When the fibula is used for maxilla reconstruction, the pedicle is usually routed to the neck near the mandibular ramus. Any periosteum retained with the pedicle is likely to ossify and fuse with the ramus at points of contact, thereby causing restriction of jaw movements, as in this case. Hence, care must be taken while harvesting and shaping the fibula to ensure that the periosteum is cut flush with the fibula, and no part of it stays with the pedicle.[4]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Deshpande SN, Kumar V. Ectodermal dysplasia – Maxillary and mandibular alveolar reconstruction with dental rehabilitation: A case report and review of the literature. Indian J Plast Surg 2010;43:92-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
González-García R, Manzano D, Ruiz-Laza L, Moreno-García C, Monje F. The rare phenomenon of vascular pedicle ossification of free fibular flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39:114-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mays AC, Gillenwater AM, Garvey PB. Rare presentation of heterotopic ossification along a fibula free flap pedicle in a high-volume microvascular reconstruction practice. Head Neck 2018;40:E21-E24.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tarsitano A, Sgarzani R, Betti E, Oranges CM, Contedini F, Cipriani R, et al. Vascular pedicle ossification of free fibular flap: Is it a rare phenomenon? Is it possible to avoid this risk? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013;33:307-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow