Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 138  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (147 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
  In this article
   Appropriate Diag...
   Treatment Option
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1716    
    Printed86    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded60    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
COMMENTARY
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 54
 

Is Bleomycin a worthy alternative?


Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and RI, Chennai, India

Date of Web Publication21-May-2011

Correspondence Address:
Jyotsna Murthy
Department of Plastic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and RI, Chennai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.81442

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Murthy J. Is Bleomycin a worthy alternative?. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:54

How to cite this URL:
Murthy J. Is Bleomycin a worthy alternative?. Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Aug 19];44:54. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2011/44/1/54/81442


Bleomycin is an antibiotic discovered in 1966 and used as anti-cancer drug. It has also been used as sclerosant for lymphatic malformation with good results and minimum side effect. Like any sclerosant agent, bleomycin is popular for the treatment of lymphatic malformation with publication as recent as in January 2011. [1] Unlike surgery, sclerotherapy is better specially for avoiding injury to important nerves or structures in vicinity of lesions. [2] Acute pulmonary complication is a potential threat with bleomycin which need to be diagnosed early and treated. [4]

This study has shown the positive outcome, it does not scientifically draw conclusion for the following reasons.


  Appropriate Diagnosis Top


In 1996, the International Society of the Study of Vascular Anomalies met in Rome issued guide for nomenclatures laying foundation for improve management. [5] Often it has been printed 'Wrong Diagnosis, Wrong Treatments'. The group has suggested two basic classifications of vascular anomalies: haemangiomas and vascular malformation. Lymphatic malformation belongs to vascular malformation and further classified as micro-cystic or macro-cystic. The lesions with more than 1 cm cavities are classified as macrocystic lesions. The diagnosis of lesions in this article is haemangiomas and lymphangiomas which are not comparable. Lymphatic malformations have not been sub-classified into micro/macro-cystic lesions because macro-cystic lesion will respond to sclerotherapy unlike micro-cystic one. The lack of clarity of diagnosis prevents any sound conclusion.


  Treatment Option Top


Bleomycin is an antibiotic with toxic cellular effect for which it has been used as an anti-cancer drug. It is also used for collapsing cavities specially following malignant effusion. Bleomycin has shown to be less effective than tetracyclin injections. [5] The tretracyclin injections are not easily available. However, its analogue doxycycline and monocyclin are available, and show similar results. Proper dose and concentration are paramount for the effectiveness of any drug. The concentration of bleomycin is 1 U=1 mg and concentration of 1 U/ml for injection is essential to get 60% of successful results. Authors' claim to have the same effect with lesser concentration without any scientific study is superfluous. Although injections of bleomycin are less painful compare to other sclerosant, it is a costly drug (approximate costs $350/15 units).

In view of the above lacunae in the study, it is not appropriate to draw any conclusion from this study but it only presents the anecdotal experience of author with bleomycin. A better diagnostic criteria and study design would have really been invaluable.

 
  References Top

1.Yang Y, Sun M, Ma Q, Cheng X, Ao J, Tian L, et al. Bleomycin A5 sclerotherapy for cervicofacial lymphatic malformations. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:150-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Karavelioðlu A, Temuçin CM, Tanyel FC, Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Karnak I. Sclerotherapy with bleomycin does not adversely affect facial nerve function in children with cervicofacial cystic lymphatic malformation. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1627-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Atwa K, Abuhasna S, Shihab Z, Hashaykeh N, Hasan R. Acute pulmonary toxicity following intralesional administration of bleomycin for a lymphovenous malformation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010;45:192-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Mulliken JB, Fischman SJ, Burrow PE. Vascular Anomalies. Curr Prob Surg 2000;37:517.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Vargas FS, Wang NS, Lee HM, Gruer SE, Sassoon CS, Light RW. Effectiveness of bleomycin in comparison to tetracycline as pleural sclerosing agent in rabbits. Chest 1993;104:1582-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow