Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 136  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2516    
    Printed142    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded133    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 204--212

Lip adhesion revisited: A technical note with review of literature


Bruges Cleft and Craniofacial Centre (Director: M. Y. Mommaerts), General Hospital St. Jan, Bruges, Belgium

Correspondence Address:
Maurice Y Mommaerts
Bruges Cleft and Craniofacial Centre, AZ St. Jan Ruddershove 10, B-8000 Bruges
Belgium
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.59283

PMID: 20368859

Get Permissions

Context (Background): Lip adhesion is a direct edge approximation without changing lip landmarks or disturbing tissue required for definitive closure. This converts a complete cleft into an incomplete cleft, facilitating and enhancing subsequent definitive lip and nose repair. Aim: The study aims to describe our technique of lip adhesion and its morbidity, and discuss the rationale for its use. Settings and Design: Retrospective follow-up study of complete clefts operated upon in the Bruges Cleft and Craniofacial Centre, at the supra regional teaching hospital AZ St. Jan, Bruges, between June 1, 1991 and May 1, 2009. Methods and Material: The group comprised 33 unilateral and 24 bilateral lip adhesion procedures. The medical files were reviewed for changes in surgical technique, morbidity, and complications and their treatment. Results: The lip adhesion procedure was performed at the age of two to eight weeks postnatal, and definitive lip closure, at the age of four to six months. In all cases, segment repositioning was further controlled by a palatal guidance plate. Wound dehiscence occurred in eight patients (14.0%), and three patients (5.3%) required reoperation. Conclusions: Although complications occurred, the beneficial effects of lip adhesion in combination with a guidance plate outweighed the risks for anatomical reconstruction of a platform for definitive lip and nose repair. Modifications are suggested to reduce these complications.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Medknow