Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 1390  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
 »  Next article
 »  Previous article 
 »  Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »   Article in PDF (164 KB)
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
  In this article
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2296    
    Printed109    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded262    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
INVITED DISCUSSION
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 187-188
 

Temporomandibular joint ankylosis


Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, India

Date of Web Publication29-Jan-2010

Correspondence Address:
Mukund Jagannathan
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 20368854

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Jagannathan M. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Indian J Plast Surg 2009;42:187-8

How to cite this URL:
Jagannathan M. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Jun 25];42:187-8. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2009/42/2/187/59278


Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis, is fairly commonly seen and its treatment objectives are fairly well standardised, viz:

  • Release/ resection of the bony mass
  • Release of all restrictive forces preventing the opening of the jaw
  • Allow for normal or near normal movements of the TMJ
  • Ensure maintenance of the gap created, both to prevent reankylosis and to maintain vertical height of the mandible
  • Promote growth and correct subsequent occlusal and cosmetic deformities
The authors have correctly pointed out that gap arthroplasty is more or less outdated. There are very few studies showing favourable outcomes. [1] It runs a high risk of re-ankylosis, and does not achieve many of the aims of surgery. Interposition arthroplasty seems to be the mainstay of treatment. The nature of the interposition is what needs to be discussed. An ideal interposition would fulfil the following criteria:

  • Autogenous tissue
  • Available in the vicinity, i. e. same operative field
  • Should not change in volume and characteristics over time
  • Should promote growth
  • Should recreate as close to a normal joint as possible.
As yet, there is no single modality which meets all these requirements.

The authors have used three types of interpositional material. What they have not mentioned is the basis for selection of each, in a given case. The roles of silastic interposition as well as temporalis fascia are similar, but the costochondral graft has a totally different purpose. These purposes are not interchangeable, and each has clear cut indications. Costochondral grafts are used in the growing mandible, as an adaptive growth source.

The etymology of flaps used needs to be standardised. The authors refer to temporal fascia and temporalis fascia in different places in the article. A more appropriate term would be deep temporal fascia, which is the deep fascia overlying the temporalis muscle. It is not clear if or how the fascia was maintained in the gap. There is no mention of any retaining sutures. The thickness of even folded fascia, is still less than the extent of bony resection.

The duration of ankyloses has not been mentioned by the authors. It is relevant, and plays a great role in the eventual successful rehabilitation of the patient.

Though the authors have obtained the most satisfactory results in terms of mouth opening and non-recurrence of the ankylosis, it would be unfair to conclude unequivocally that deep temporal fascia is the best interposition material. The variables are several, including extent of ankylosis, duration, mouth opening on table, compliance of the patient in the postoperative exercise regimen, etc. Again, a year's follow up may not take into account growth changes which are age related.

Interposition arthroplasty, over a long term follow up should maintain the gap consistently. This has to be studied by imaging including CT and MR, to determine the integrity of the joint space.

Unfortunately, most of the locally available tissues (muscle, temporoparietal, as well as deep temporal fasciae) even though vascularised, tend to atrophy over a period of time. In all operated cases of re-ankyloses, there is no evidence of the nature of the tissue used.

Cartilage disc interposition has been well studied in sheep models, and show consistent appearance of pseudo joint spaces above the cartilage. [2] The cartilage itself undergoes organisation into an organised structure. Even masseter muscle transposition has been studied in experimental animals, and the muscle histology has revealed fairly viable muscle, with partial fibrosis, which maintains a good interposition. [3] There have been no studies for histological or long term radiological integrity of a fascial flap.Vascularised cartilage, as used by this author (Mukund Jagannathan) and reported in a previous issue of this journal [4] , appears to fulfil several of the criteria. Long term follow up images will soon be in print.

To summarise, interposition arthroplasty is part of the surgical treatment of TMJ ankylosis. This can be performed with several tissues. It is difficult to conclude that one is clearly better than the other, since the indications for each would vary. Long term detailed evaluation is needed before any conclusions can be drawn.

 
 » References Top

1.Roychoudhury A, Parkash H, Trikha A. Functional restoration by gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A report of 50 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:166-9.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Takaishi M, Kurita K, Matsuura H, Goss AN. Effect of auricular cartilage graft in the surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: An experimental study using sheep. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:198-204.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Shimuzu M, Kurita K, Matsuura H, Ishimaru JI, Goss AN. The role of muscle grafts in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: Short- term experimental study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:842-9.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Jagannathan M, Devale M, Kesari P, Karanth S. Use of vascularised cartilage as an additional interposition in temporomandibular ankylosis surgery: Rationale, advantages and potential benefits. Indian J Plast Surg 2008;41:110-5.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



This article has been cited by
1 Selecting reconstruction option for tmj ankylosis: A surgeonęs dilemma
Sahoo, N.K. and Tomar, K. and Kumar, A. and Roy, I.D.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012; 23(6): 1796-1801
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow