Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 990  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
 »  Next article
 »  Previous article 
 »  Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Article in PDF (208 KB)
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
  In this article
 »  Abstract
 »  Materials and Me...
 »  Results
 »  Conclusion
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed8538    
    Printed153    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded354    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 39  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 157-162
 

Does closure of chronic pilonidal sinus still remain a matter of debate after bilateral rotation flap? (N-shaped closure technique)


Department of Plastic Surgery, Zagazig University Hospital, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed MS Awad
Department of Plastic Surgery, Zagazig University Hospital
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.29545

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Background: Controversy still exists about the exact cause of pilonidal sinus either acquired or congenital, and also about what is the best surgical technique for the treatment of the disease. We successfully treated chronic pilonidal sinus with a new flap technique {N-shaped bilateral rotation flap} for closure of the defect. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients (30 men and two women) were treated by eccentric elliptical excision of the diseased tissues down to the postsacral fascia and closure of the defect with our flap [which is a random pattern flap], then a closed suction drain was placed at the base of the wound, with its tip being brought out in the gluteal region at least 5 cm lateral to the lower end of the suture line. Results: All our patients healed completely without recurrence during a period of average follow-up of two years. Mean hospital stay was 1.5 days (range 1-5 days). Mean time to complete healing was 11.9 days (range 6-18 days). Mean time off work was 13.7 days (range 10-21 days). Two patients had wound infection and one patient a partial breakdown. The recurrence rate was 0%. Conclusions: A tension-free suture via bilateral rotation flaps with a good suction at the button of the wound for drainage of blood from the bottom of the wound is the key to the success of repair without recurrence.


Keywords: N-shaped flap, pilonidal sinus, rotation flap


How to cite this article:
Awad MM, Saad KM. Does closure of chronic pilonidal sinus still remain a matter of debate after bilateral rotation flap? (N-shaped closure technique). Indian J Plast Surg 2006;39:157-62

How to cite this URL:
Awad MM, Saad KM. Does closure of chronic pilonidal sinus still remain a matter of debate after bilateral rotation flap? (N-shaped closure technique). Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Jul 16];39:157-62. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2006/39/2/157/29545


Pilonidal sinus is an acquired condition usually seen in young adults that carries high postoperative morbidity and patient discomfort. The most important predisposing factors for the development of pilonidal sinus are the existence of a deep natal cleft and the presence of hair within the cleft.[1],[2] A deep natal cleft is a favourable environment for sweating, maceration, bacterial contamination and penetration of hairs. Thus, for treatment and prevention, these causative factors must be eliminated.[3],[4] Despite the controversy about the best surgical technique for the treatment of pilonidal sinus, the aim of this study is to reach an ideal operation that would minimize financial cost to the community and the patient (e.g., earlier return to work), be simple, not require a prolonged hospital stay, have low recurrence rate and be associated with low complication rate and minimal pain.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Thirty-two patients were treated with bilateral elliptical cutaneous rotation {N-shaped} flap during the period April 2003 to June 2004. All patients had chronic pilonidal sinus. Ten patients had recurrent disease after a failed surgical procedure; the rest were primary surgery. All patients were admitted to the hospital the day before the surgery and operated under general or spinal anaesthesia. The natal cleft was shaved the day before the surgery. The patients were placed in prone jack-knife position on the operating table with the legs slightly abducted and the buttocks strapped apart by adhesive tapes on the table.

The surgical procedure is a vertical elliptical excision of all the diseased tissue down to the postsacral fascia; we prefer to excise it in an eccentric manner with respect to the skin level [Figure - 1][Figure - 4]. This was done to get the eventual line of closure away from the midline [Figure - 2][Figure - 5]. This will be elaborated later. Care must be taken to handle tissues as gently as possible and meticulous hemostasis should be accomplished. N-shaped cutaneous skin flap was marked on both sides of the excised sinus over the gluteus muscle fascia [Figure - 4].

The flaps were then raised, rotated and advanced on both sides and sutured subcutaneously with 3-0 Polyglactin beginning from its lower edge [Figure - 5][Figure - 6]. The stitch should include the postsacral fascia so as not to leave a dead space. The skin was sutured with vertical mattress stitch of 3-0 Prolene. The secondary defect was sutured primarily with the same material in a similar fashion after cutaneous release on both sides [Figure - 2]. Closed suction drains were placed in potential space in all patients and removed after 14 days.

Wound inspection and dressing were done twice each week [Figure - 7], followed by a firm dressing to cause physiological compression at the natal cleft site, removal of sutures was done after ten days. The patients were instructed to have bed rest, backing supine position without fear of vascular compromization.


 » Results Top


Thirty-two patients with chronic pilonidal sinus were treated with this technique. Of these ten patients had recurrent disease after a failed previous surgical procedure.

Mean age was 30.4 years (range 18 to 45). Mean follow-up was 22 months (range 12 to 32). The mean time of hospital stay was 1.5 days range (1-5) days. The mean time of complete healing was 11.9 days (range 6-18 days).

There was no recurrence, [Figure - 8][Figure - 9] show our long term results only one case had partial wound breakdown due to collected seroma and two patients had wound infection [6.3%]. Incidentally, in both these patients, the shaving of the operative site was done in the operating theatre immediately before surgery. These cases were controlled with daily dressing and antibiotics according to the culture sensitivity [Table - 1].

Comments

Surgical treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus includes open excision;[5],[6] primary closure;[7] just lay open and[8] excision and flap closure. 'Lay open' is the simplest technique among these but the complete healing time is long and the recurrence rate is 10%.[6] Open excision technique needs long hospitalization and wound dressing daily. Wound breakdown is also another disadvantage caused by premature closing of the skin edges before complete wound healing. Excision of the diseased tissue down to the postsacral fascia is generally accepted but the management of the remaining defect is still a matter of debate. Primary closure of the wound is a simple technique but it has a high recurrence rate due to continuing natal cleft. But Tritapepe and Padova 2002[9] after 5 to 15 years follow-up in 243 cases with chronic sinus irrespective of lifting the natal cleft, stated that excision and primary closure with a catheter at the bottom of the wound and the use of antiseptic/saline flushing are essential for primary intention healing and the avoidance of recurrences Bascom[7] reported that pilonidal abscesses never begin on a convex surface and reducing the depth of the concave fold that harbours the problem cures the disease.

In our study with respect to the site of the sinus we found that high incidence occurred at the side wall of the natal cleft more toward its upper end [Figure - 3], [Table - 2]. Another important issue is wound tension. Tension-free closure improves patient comfort and shortens hospital stay. In this regard, flap procedures have an advantage. Several flap techniques have been described with various results.

The Z-plasty procedure has been described by Monro and MacDermott[8] in 1965. The disadvantage of this procedure is that part of the wound is in the midline which is the main cause of recurrence. Besides, flap tip necrosis has been reported.

The W-plasty technique has been described by Roth and Moorman in 1977.[10] Part of the wound is still in the midline and recurrence rate is high (8%).

To decrease the incidence of recurrence, many procedures were developed to avoid the midline sutures like "D" excision which is a surgical technique of elliptical incision and primary wound closure. The overall success rate is 80%.[11] Another flap technique that avoids the midline wound is the advancement flap operation described by Karydakis.[9],[12], After excision of the pilonidal sinus, one of the wound edges is undermined and advanced against the other wound edge and sutured. Its recurrence rate is 1% to 4%, complication rate 8.5% to 9% and the mean hospitalization stay is three to four days.[13]

Either with D excision or Karydakis and Bascom techniques, the common factor is all of them excised the diseased skin and subcutaneous tissue in a limited manner to avoid a big excision that may lead to tension sutures and wound breakdown.

Karydakis[12] noticed the presence of hair in all his patients thus he advocated to excise the diseased tissue including that containing hair with suturing of the defect away from the midline to avoid the weak or macerated skin in the mid line and lifting the natal cleft. These manoeuvres all avoid trapping the loose hair from the body and decrease the recurrence rate.

In our study only three patients had hair in the sinus. We are still not certain whether hair is the cause of the disease or whether the accumulation of hair is merely incidental in the disease process but we found that all of our patients had an itching tendency either in the natal cleft or between the fingers. Thus we advocate the main problem is from itching, through creation of macerated skin, which is liable to attract and collect any necrotic debris and loose hair eventually forming the pilonidal sinus. Also, it is notable that the data collected in our study shows the sinus present mostly in patients with scanty hair and shallow natal cleft.

The closure of the defect with a flap technique has been a matter of debate until now. We advocate that the problem of recurrence after pilonidal sinus management may be due to incomplete excision of the diseased tissue and closure of the defect with tension sutures that leads to wound breakdown during the shearing movement at the natal area. We closed the defect after wide excision of all diseased tissue down to the postsacral fascia with bilateral cutaneous rotation flap without any tension at the suture line and with a minimal arc of rotation versus the elliptical rotation flap done by others that need rotation at right angle it also it had a narrow pedicle which can be easlily compromised.

Despite controversy about the best surgical technique for the treatment of pilonidal sinus, an ideal operation should be simple, should not need a prolonged hospital stay, should have a low recurrence rate and should be associated with minimal pain and wound care to decrease time off work.[14]

The Limberg flap is another transposition technique; it is suitable only for closure of rhomboid defects with angles of 60 and 120 degrees and the flap depends on the looseness of adjacent skin. Reported complication and recurrence rates are 6% and 4.9%, respectively.[15]

Closure of the defect with a rotation flap is described by Cherry.[16] The technique seems to be similar to elliptical rotation flap at first glance. However, it creates a line of tension along the radius of the arc that may necessitate back-cut. This decreases the blood supply to the flap.[17] It has an 8% recurrence rate.

Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus was published by Nasser et al ., in 2003[18] A random pattern flap based on the subdermal plexus allows elevation of an elliptical-shaped flap of skin and subcutaneous tissue with a length to width ratio in the range of 2 to 1.5:1. Although limited in reach, this random pattern flap can be elevated and rotated to provide viable skin and subcutaneous tissue to close an adjacent wound.[19]

We agree that this method has minimal inconvenience and lower recurrence rates than other methods but this method requires much more experience because it requires the dissection of cutaneous and subcutaneous tissue and gluteus muscle fascia.[20] In addition, only a 1-cm pivot point in its lower corner has been used in this technique. After the rotation of the flap, the vascular elements in the flap can be destroyed and flap necrosis can occur easily, so this surgical technique is not advisable in our opinion for all kinds of pilonidal sinus disease.

The Limberg flap scores in simplicity but it needs excessive mobilization, it also needs an expert surgeon and more excision of a normal skin for marking the rhomboid shape of 60 and 120 degree.

Our flap in the present study depends on basic knowledge of performing the rotation flap. It also carries the advantage of minimal dissection and the bilateral rotation has a big advantage of tension-free sutures. Thus it easy to rotate without any compromise of the blood supply of the flap. This results in no recurrence and minimum period off from work.


 » Conclusion Top


Shifting of the natal cleft away from the midline and obliteration of dead space by our flap has an advantage over other techniques like Z-shaped and rhomboid operations.

 
 » References Top

1.Karydakis GE. The etiology of pilonidal sinus. Hellenic Armed Forces Med Rev 1975;7:411-6.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Page BH. The entry of hairs into a pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 1969;56:32.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Dasiran F. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap. Surgery 2003;134:745-9.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Karydakis GE. Hair insertion (pilonidal sinus). Hellenic Armed Forces Med Rev 1968;2:273-85.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Jensen SL, Harling H. Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess. Br J Surg 1989;75:60-1.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Notaras MJ. A review of three popular methods of treatment of postanal (pilonidal) sinus disease. Br J Surg 1970;57:886-90.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Bascom J. Skin flaps for pilonidal disease. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:338.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Monro SR, MacDermot FT. The elimination of causal factors in pilonidal sinus treated by Z-plasty. Br J Surg 1965;52:177-81.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Tritapepe R, Di Padova C. Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus using a drain for antiseptic wound flushing. Am J Surg 2002;183:209-11.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Roth RF, Moorman WL. Treatment of pilonidal sinus and cyst by conservative excision and W-plasty closure. Plast Reconst Surg 1977;60:412-5.   Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Mann CV, Springall R. 'D' excision for sacrococcygeal pilonidalsinus disease. J R Soc Med 1987;80:292-5.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg 1992;62:385-9.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Kitchen PR. Pilonidal sinus: Experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 1996;83:1452-5.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Akıncı OF, Coskun A, Uzunkoy A. Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus: Asymmetric excision and primary closure using suction drain and subcuticular skin closure. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:701-7.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Urhan MK, Kucukel F, Topgul K, Ozer I, Sari S. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:656-9.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Cherry JK. Primary closure of pilonidal sinus. Surg Gynecol Obst 1968;126:1263-9.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Aston SJ, Beasley RW, Thorne CHM. Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery. 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia;1997.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Nessar G, Kayaalp C, Seven C. Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus. Am J Surg 2004;187:300-3.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, Anatomy and Technique. Churchill-Livingstone: New York; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Yazicioglu B, Polat C, Gokce O. Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus. Am J Surg 2006;191:142.  Back to cited text no. 20    


    Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5], [Figure - 6], [Figure - 7], [Figure - 8], [Figure - 9]

    Tables

[Table - 1], [Table - 2]


This article has been cited by
1 A Comparative Study between Karydakis Flap Reconstruction and Double Z-Plasty in Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease
Ankit Kayal,Akhlak Hussain,Anil Choudhary,Ashok Meghwal
International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 S3-Leitlinie: Sinus pilonidalis
A. Ommer,E. Berg,C. Breitkopf,D. Bussen,D. Doll,A. Fürst,A. Herold,F. Hetzer,T.H. Jacobi,H. Krammer,B.H. Lenhard,G. Osterholzer,S. Petersen,R. Ruppert,O. Schwandner,M. Sailer,T.H.K. Schiedeck,M. Schmidt-Lauber,M. Stoll,B. Strittmatter,I. Iesalnieks
coloproctology. 2014; 36(4): 272
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow