Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
An open access publication of Association of Plastic Surgeons of India
Users Online: 336  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (23 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3598    
    Printed137    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded82    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 143
 

Author's reply


Orthopeadic Surgeon, Mangalore, India

Correspondence Address:
Orthopeadic Surgeon, Mangalore, India
sumanajk@hotmail.com



How to cite this article:
Kamath J. Author's reply. Indian J Plast Surg 2004;37:143


How to cite this URL:
Kamath J. Author's reply. Indian J Plast Surg [serial online] 2004 [cited 2019 May 27];37:143. Available from: http://www.ijps.org/text.asp?2004/37/2/143/13683


Sir,

I was delighted to go through the comments[1] from a good friend Dr. R. Ravishanker regarding the pedicle protection for flap surgery for posterior heel defects which was published earlier.[2]

I would first like to congratulate Dr. R. Ravishanker for having shown the readers one more easier method to solve the difficult problem. However, when one considers the reliability of the method for pedicle protection, one should not hesitate to resort to external fixation method. The method described by me was to introduce only two thin [1.5 to 1.8 mm] K wires in the subcutaneous area of the metaphyseal region of the tibia for only 10 to 14 days, a procedure one may hardly call invasive in orthopaedic related plastic surgery. Moreover, when there is a need for tubular external fixator for concomitant skeletal injury, the ring fixator assembly can be incorporated into the tubular fixator without the need for two additional K wires. Ring fixators are widely used in orthopaedic surgery these days and are reusable any number of times. However, if the ring fixators are not available, one can use conventional tubular fixators.

Further, the ease with which the patient can be managed postoperatively whether it is for foot elevation, repeated flap inspection, change of dressing or change of posture to lateral decubitus, the external- fixator method scores over the conventional plaster of paris method, both theoretically and practically. Finally, it is the surgeon's choice to decide what is best for the patient under his or her care in the given set-up. 

  References Top

1.Ravishanker R. Pedicle protection for flap surgery for posterior heel defects. Comments Indian J Plast Surg 2004;37:81.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Kamath JB. A Simple Method for pedicle protection for flap surgery in posterior heel defects. Indian J Plast Surg 2003;36:104.  Back to cited text no. 2    

 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Site Map  |  Home  |  Contact Us  |  Feedback  |  Copyright and Disclaimer
Online since 11th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow